When used in the context of literally keeping people away I don't see how you can't call it classism..... The motivation is literally to keep "less desireables" out by raising the price to a point that they can't afford. To be clear, I'm not saying that raising prices is always classism -- it very rarely is IMHO..... but in this context, it's hard to argue that it's not.
This is a whole different thing..... and it's not even about raising rates, it's about changing the structure of things. I know it's not what you're saying but your statement could be interpreted as you saying that people who are poor are out to game the system and default. Closing loopholes isn't classism either....
Sure, that happens..... but yet that could be resolved by some different rules and requirements. Regardless, this isn't everyone that is of a lower income that is doing this..... It's not fair to punish those that are being honest and respectful because some people ruin things. Hell, if you really want to dive into this I could say that wealthy people who complain about stupid shit and delay lines and stuff could be just as annoying..... Not that I'm trying to make that argument but I'm just saying that it's not like there's a "perfect" class of people.
I don't understand how this isn't classism..... too many people so we raise the price and punish those that make less money. That's really not a fair thing to do.