Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!
Feb 13, 2018
12
17
20
I wouldn't say it's the most accurate prediction method, but it does represent sort of how the company wants to move forward, at least in terms of parks they'd give lavish marketing budgets towards (and thus, the parks the company wants to build up). The parks without presidents that have been marketed since then are Dorney Park, Six Flags Discovery Kingdom, Six Flags New England and Six Flags Qiddiya (which each have only been featured in marketing once, or, a 2.4%).
sfmarketing.jpg
 
I think this is a neat idea. I agree that it’s probably not representative of Six Flags’ intentions for the parks, but it’s always interesting to see behavior laid out with data.

My suggestion would be to give more specifics about your process. What’s your unit of measure? How did you collect your data? Without knowing what the numbers mean, it’s hard to contextualize your findings.
 
You need to remove Six Flags Qiddiya from that graph as that park is not owned by Six Flags. It's owned by the Qiddiya Investment Company which is part of the greater Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia. They're the ones controlling the marketing budget for that park.
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad