Register or Login to Hide This Ad for Free!

Zachary

Administrator
Sep 23, 2009
15,972
46,882
260
Virginia
Uh oh...

ReleaseWire said:
San Diego, CA -- (ReleaseWire) -- 08/18/2014 -- An investigation on behalf of investors of SeaWorld Entertainment Inc (NYSE:SEAS) shares over potential securities laws violations by SeaWorld Entertainment and certain of its directors and officers in connection certain financial statements was announced.

[...]

The investigation by a law firm focuses on possible claims on behalf of purchasers of the securities of SeaWorld Entertainment Inc (NYSE:SEAS) concerning whether a series of statements by SeaWorld Entertainment regarding its business, its prospects and its operations were materially false and misleading at the time they were made.

SeaWorld Entertainment Inc went public in April 2013 and shares of SeaWorld Entertainment Inc (NYSE:SEAS) reached $38.88 per share in May 2013.

On March 13, 2014, SeaWorld Entertainment Inc announced “record” fully year 2013 result. SeaWorld Entertainment Inc reported that its Total Revenue rose from over $1.42 billion in 2012 to over $1.46 billion in 2013 and that its Net Income declined from $77.44 million in 2012 to $50.48 million in 2013.

On April 3, 2014, SeaWorld Entertainment Inc announced the pricing of its secondary offering.

On May 14, 2014, SeaWorld Entertainment Inc reported its first quarter 2014 results. SeaWorld Entertainment Inc reported that its first quarter Revenue declined from $238.61 million in 2013 to $212.29 million in 2014 and that its first quarter Net Loss increased from $40.36 million in 2013 to $49.43 million in 2014.

Then on August 13, 2014, SeaWorld Entertainment Inc reported its second quarter 2014 results. Among other things, SeaWorld Entertainment Inc disclosed that its second quarter Revenue declined from $411.3 million in 2013 to $405.2 million in 2014 and issued its guidance for the full year of 2014.

Shares of SeaWorld Entertainment Inc (NYSE:SEAS) declined to as low as $17.83 per share on August 14, 2014.

Those who purchased shares of SeaWorld Entertainment Inc (NYSE:SEAS) have certain options and should contact the Shareholders Foundation.

Source
 
Feb 9, 2013
4,643
6,476
250
I hope this doesn't hurt stock prices, again. Because they still haven't gotten out of the $18 range.
 

Zimmy

Nessie is lonely.
Silver Donor
Sep 28, 2013
5,875
8,562
250
Virginia Beach
investor confidence will certainly take a hit. This week will be critical. If it dips below down to 13 I would not bet on a rebound.
 
Sep 8, 2010
1,465
1,748
250
Charlottesville
Normally this wouldn't be a HUGE deal (happened to Facebook, Twitter, etc as of late). But when you consider this on top of everything else happening, it's sorta multiplies itself.

I doubt the stock will drop much further because of THIS, unless of course some bad news does come out of this. In which case.... RIP.
 
Jul 10, 2014
1,129
2,729
250
These sorts of investigations are usually conducted for two reasons:

1. The government is trying to punish a politically unpopular entity, or an entity that has somehow earned the disfavor of those in power.

2. Some of the shareholders are having a snit about the stock losing so much value, so they launch an investigation hoping that it will act as a sort of emetic that will cause current corporate to be vomited out and punished.

I'm guessing #2 in this case, though given the politics of "animal rights" and the current state of American government, there could be a little #1 in there as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jesy

SDG

Jul 21, 2013
104
437
160
"...regarding its business, its prospects and its operations were materially false and misleading at the time they were made." I said this from the very beginning. Many people were fired for this very reason for trying to "whistle blow". Unfortunately not all types of whistle blowing are protected by law. How much crap does it take before people realize maybe there is something not right here?
 
Dec 23, 2011
7,132
5,079
250
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/seaworld-hit-lawsuit-failure-advise-731846

I believe this fits here. They are finally getting hit with a lawsuit. The lawsuits is mainly about how SEAS blamed poor weather and that Easter was at an odd time of the year when in reality Blackfish had caused the attendance drops.

Honestly, I'm not sure how you can prove that Blackfish was the cause of lost attendance over poor weather and Easter at a different time of year, but reading through the article, things do not look all that great for SEAS.
 
Sep 8, 2010
1,465
1,748
250
Charlottesville
Yeahhhhh, I see that going no where. Their claimed excuses can technically have data to back it. Where as Blackfish.... cant. That's grasping for straws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parkgoer
Dec 23, 2011
7,132
5,079
250
The odd things is, they state that SEAS knew Blackfish had an impact on attendance, but they didn't share that with shareholders until the proposed laws in California.
 
Sep 8, 2010
1,465
1,748
250
Charlottesville
Party Rocker said:
The odd things is, they state that SEAS knew Blackfish had an impact on attendance, but they didn't share that with shareholders until the proposed laws in California.

I mean, SEAS knows Blackfish is a thing.... and there's always the possibility it causes attendance issues. But there's literally no way to prove it.
 

Ziva

fancy cafe latte
May 30, 2011
317
631
210
It's not whether or not they can PROVE that Blackfish was a factor. You're right, of course you can't prove that. It's about whether or not SEAS withheld information purposefully. The shareholders clearly think that SEAS denied that Blackfish played a role at all when instead management had information that that was not the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Party Rocker

b.mac

Indiana Beach Vibe
May 14, 2011
4,774
7,081
250
BFE, Virginia
When other companies pay attention to the backlash and when there are whole 'slander' campaigns against the one entity you can't really pretend it's a non-issue. Remember, SEAS isn't the only amusement company that takes care of animals. However the big thing apparently is trying to find evidence confirming Blackfish had a clearly visible impact, which is next to impossible. Easter week itself can set a major seasonal park an attendance figure above 200,000 alone, weather can turn potential 40,000+ days into 5,000 guest days. As much as I want to rag on SEAS for using Easter and weather as an excuse, they are legitimate reasons. Compare this to the Blackfish protests, where there is no acquirable data on how many potential customers were influenced by it. Same with something like Texas Giant for example, while it's a huge hit to a park's reputation there's no definitive proof that it has a major lasting impact on attendance figures.
 

Ziva

fancy cafe latte
May 30, 2011
317
631
210
But if anyone high-up-enough working for SEAS expressed their concern re: Blackfish and the bottom line, that counts. That's the same thing in legal terms. No one's looking for definitive proof, because it doesn't exist. What matters is if the park withheld information and/or straight-out lied to the shareholders.

TL;DR No one's looking for PROOF that Blackfish cut attendance, because there isn't any
 
Consider Donating to Hide This Ad