Lawsuit claims breach of contract.
San Diego season passholder files lawsuit, which seeks class-action status for annual membership customers nationwide.
Go back and read the article again. The class-action lawsuit is Nationwide. There is a 2nd part of the suit tied to California residents only.It's class-action but filed in California against SWSD; so other seas passholders wouldn't likely be members of the class. Though this could set precedent for a larger suit.
This.Go back and read the article again. The class-action lawsuit is Nationwide. There is a 2nd part of the suit tied to California residents only.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2)(A) because this case is a class action where the aggregate claims of all members of the proposed class are in excess of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and most members of the proposed nationwide class are citizens of states different from the states of Defendant.
9. Plaintiff seeks relief in this action individually, and on behalf of all of Defendant’s customers nationwide that have paid or were charged fees while Defendant’s amusement parks and water parks were closed for Defendant’s violations of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Civil Code §§1750, et seq., Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq., False Advertising Law (“FAL”), Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17500, et seq., for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and money had and received.