I think a lot of people go to the front, because the received wisdom about roller coasters is that is scariest seat. People like to prove they are cool or brave by riding in the front.
Stand up rides are, among the pantheon of terrible ride ideas, one of the worst. Yes, I am saying an ENTIRE class of ride independent of manufacture are as bad, if not WORSE then BGWs greatest ride mistake (I’m looking at you, Drachen Fire).I still don't understand the fascination with standup rides - 'your legs/feet starting to ache a little from walking around all day? Stay standing and let's put them through some intense forces!'
Though if the restraint system was a little different and basically allowed for your body to be supported by your torso without either stapling you into the restraints or putting a massive amount of pressure on your body, maybe this could be a winner?
If they're going to progress with the concept of a standup than it needs to do things that require standing up to get a better/more unique experience - maybe a beyond 90 drop that puts your feet above your head. Putting stand up trains on a course that can be done with a floorless train is a waste and will automatically make the ride worse than it needs to be.I have mixed feelings about standups. But, if you do want to progress with the concept, a better restraint is essential.
I hope so. That would at least make the coaster feel different than other standing coastersIs the idea here that you'd be standing sideways like if you were actually surfing?
They have money, just... not enough so about right ?SEAS finally paying back B&M be like:
View attachment 21938
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.