Piece doesnt fit - take measurements - send to engineering - draft new part - manufacture new part - ship new part - install new part.
I thought at the ACE event you didn't get to tour the construction site. So it couldn't it have been on property just not installed?It was NOT there during the ACE event. I asked about it and received a non-answer.
I thought at the ACE event you didn't get to tour the construction site. So it couldn't it have been on property just not installed?
It could have been but the also had a small section not done to allow equipment access to the site. What you saw could have also been related to that section.Ok that's what I meant in my original post. In some of the pictures from the media tour it looks like it's on property
Finally watched a video for the recent hard hat tour and seeing that last piece of track they are waiting to install. Anyone know exactly what equipment needs access? Just wondering if in the future when it comes time to paint or something that requires a crane or man lifts will access be a problem?
Ropes are definately a option and there are even some pretty good videos online of some crews inspecting i305.I think in I305 there's videos of track crews using ropes and harnesses to access the tall stuff; wouldn't be too surprised if that is the standard way of doing it - not sure if that's only track inspection and mechanical/electrical work or they could also paint doing that.
I'd imagine there's a way to get a smaller crane in to hoist a paint crew and their gear?
I saw pictures of the station area. It's coming along SLOWLY as in they are still working on the structure so no theming yet.I wonder if the queue is coming along
Okay, but... How fast does it launch to 73 mph?Alright, I had to watch it again to take note of what I noticed last night. Really, all of my comments can be reduced to 3 major points.
1) The video implies that Hydualic launches are the "old" way to do launches and that linear motors were created to solve the mechanical issues with hydraulic launches. This is not true. LIMs and LSMs were around before Intamin introduced the Hydraulic launch with Xcelerator in 2002. The hydraulic launch was created to get a faster and more forceful launch than LIMs/LSMs could produce at the time. The only reason we don't see many of these still being built is that LSMs have gotten much better in the past 20 years and launch coasters like TTD and KK are really not seen as favorably by parks now as they were back in the early 2000's (just my opinion).
2) The video says that to brake with LSMs, you have to power the stators backwards. Also not true, since the Stators have large mounts of copper inside them, with the permanent magnets mounted on the ride vehicle, it is already having eddy current braking effects. This is why rides like Verbolten don't actually have copper fins on their launches. An E-Stop (Or other loss of drive power) would still stop the train as if there were copper fins. Intamin tends to put extra fins in their launches, most likely because they can achieve the speed needed without the extra stators and would need the braking power if a roll back occurred, but don't want to spring for stators they don't need. I believe that running the stators backwards would slow the train down faster, by applying force back on the train, but would require substantial cooling and would risk launching the train backwards if malfunctioned. Not what you want in a safety situation when you can just kill power and the magnets will stop everything already.
3) The video says that the drop track is a freefall drop. While yes, you feel weightless while riding, chances are that there is not a true freefall happening, since the track is always being supported by a pneumatic piston. The drop track on Hagrid's and 13's are more akin to the S&S TurboDrop ride, where as Zierer's design is a modified mini drop tower in essence.
Not really a point, but it did bug me) Also, the times he referenced "Master Computer" instead of simply stating that it is a PLC, an industrial computer, bugs me, but that's probably because PLCs are my day job.
One thing I really did not know about Hagrid's that I think is cool are RFID chips for Operators. While I don't think that ride ops need to be babysat, the RFID does protect the park in case of complaint or incident and encourage ride ops to do their jobs correctly. While working at the park, there were a few instances where I was approached by guests claiming that one of my team members did not check their harness. Not having been there, it is only a he said she said situation. In those cases, we usually have to side with the guest unless other witnesses are found. Having a system like this could mitigate any issues in figuring out what actually went on. ID chips also could be used for incentives for quick dispatching.
The thing I really did not know about Hagrid's that I think is cool are RFID chips for Operators. While I don't think that ride ops need to be babysat, the RFID does protect the park in case of complaint or incident and encourage ride ops to do their jobs correctly. While working at the park, there were a few instances where I was approached by guests claiming that one of my team members did not check their harness. Not having been there, it is only a he said she said situation. In those cases, we usually have to side with the guest unless other witnesses are found. Having a system like this could mitigate any issues in figuring out what actually went on. ID chips also could be used for incentives for quick dispatching.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.