My legs always feel much more secure in the B&Ms, and yes they get to the "flying" position in the station. I much prefer the B&Ms.
horsesboy said:I have not had the chance to try a B&M yet. I take from the video posted that they rotate you into position while in the station? That was one of my complaints about Batwing is that you are laying down till the top off the lift hill and the flip and I never seem to be able to situated myse lf in what feels like a secure manner. The idea about having a chance to get comfortable and familiar with the the restraints before being up 100+ feet seems much more appealing to me.
Eh, you could say that about B&M inverted vehicles too - nothing but the rows ahead of you in your face.bill s said:With [flying coasters] you can't see where you're going. Even if you had super neck muscles and no headrest, anything other than front row you would have feet in your face.
Yes, there about 12 seats in a dead zone, center seats on all but the front 2 rows. And with a crowd or riding with someone you may not have the choice of waiting for the next train. As long as you're not boxed in fully, it's still better than a flying coaster though (well, even then, but talking about view here). There is a certain thrill to inverteds that is different, and front is incredible, but overall I do think floorless could be seen as almost making inverts obsolete. Even avoiding those seats I find inverts more subjectively variable an experience than most coaster types. Vekoma inverts I also find almost as variable.SLC Headache said:Eh, you could say that about B&M inverted vehicles too - nothing but the rows ahead of you in your face.
Floorless coasters have the advantage of allowing for airtime that would put a lot of stress on inverted trains. The drop after the MCBR on Dominator is a good example if you don't get braked hard. But, inverteds can almost emulate swinging suspended coasters when done right. Silver Bullet's ending is a great example.bill s said:Yes, there about 12 seats in a dead zone, center seats on all but the front 2 rows. And with a crowd or riding with someone you may not have the choice of waiting for the next train. As long as you're not boxed in fully, it's still better than a flying coaster though (well, even then, but talking about view here). There is a certain thrill to inverteds that is different, and front is incredible, but overall I do think floorless could be seen as almost making inverts obsolete. Even avoiding those seats I find inverts more subjectively variable an experience than most coaster types. Vekoma inverts I also find almost as variable.SLC Headache said:Eh, you could say that about B&M inverted vehicles too - nothing but the rows ahead of you in your face.
There was a company with an idea for a standing coaster where you leaned forward. According to them this is more evocative of actually flying and it does make sense.
Hamptonian said:According to someone I know on the inside *scandalous* they're prepping the bitten house for a ride, so keep up the designs! Personally I would be suprised for a high speed launch in black forest that launches across the river. Up through Spain and back down or do inversions and the like on either side. But that's just based in the possible insider info I heard