Possibly the 1-millionth Pantheon thread viewer.
- Feb 3, 2019
Serious question - what do you think is the park's opinion of crtiques where we're seeing gaps or flaws in how they've handled something and are suggesting possible alternatives that may have a chance of working out better?
That's not to say anyone here whom has never worked in or for the industry knows what it's like making those decisions, but more that we each have our own experiences and/or expertise in certain subject areas that we feel the park could do better in.
I don't think they're paying that close attention; or, at least the people that they have looking aren't the ones that care about those aspects.
Probably more accurately, the ones looking are local, and the decisions that we're complaining about are corporate and the local people can't do anything about it.