Nora said:
... zoo's [sic] provided captured Bison for breading ...
Sadly, "breading" them wouldn't help
-- just kidding, know you meant breeding.
Since my first visit was in 1999 (I don't remember a petting zoo being there, but we went primarily to ride the brand new AC and beyond making sure we rode all the coasters we didn't necessarily take in everything) I don't have fond memories of a petting zoo, so that isn't necessarily my first choice, but I do think animals should have more of a presence at BGW. And the thing is, they already do have more animals than are regularly on exhibit. I know they use them for educational programs and presentations, but animals like the sloth and the fox that are only occasionally out in the area by Lorikeet Glen -- it would be nice to have them on more regular display, and also to have a published schedule of when particular animals will be out. Of course there would have to be caveats that a particular animal could never be absolutely guaranteed to be out due to illness, behavior issue, etc. but it would be nice if you could reasonably predict that you'd see, say, the sloth on certain days or the wallaroo on others.
I've really wanted to see the young fox they got this spring but haven't caught it on display yet and of course no one can tell me when it may be out, staff only say to check what's out next to the lorikeets.
So I think they could utilize what they already have by getting some of the "backstage" animals out in the park more, and a great step in that direction is the barn owl in the Highland Stables. But in addition I would certainly enjoy more permanent animal exhibits. The fields just beyond Italy on the train ride do seem like they could be used for some more European animals, like Nora suggested, and I wouldn't think other hooved species would be too difficult to have in proximity to the horses and sheep, e.g.